| URN | etd-0713125-160743 | Statistics | This thesis had been viewed 27 times. Download 1 times. |
| Author | Chao-Shun Cheng | ||
| Author's Email Address | No Public. | ||
| Department | Institute of construction technology | ||
| Year | 2024 | Semester | 2 |
| Degree | Master | Type of Document | Master's Thesis |
| Language | zh-TW.Big5 Chinese | Page Count | 91 |
| Title | Research on the Effectiveness of Promoting Seismic Reinforcement of Private Residential Buildings - A Case Study of Hualien County | ||
| Keyword | |||
| Abstract | T This study investigates the effectiveness of promoting seismic reinforcement for private residential buildings, focusing on Hualien County as a case study. Employing questionnaire surveys and expert interviews, the analysis of six aspects from the questionnaire reveals that, apart from the public's willingness to undergo seismic reinforcement (average score of 3.44), the average scores for the other five aspects are all below 3. This reflects a general lack of understanding among Hualien County residents regarding the condition of their own homes (average score of 2.76), the basic requirements for applying for seismic reinforcement (average score of 2.12), the subsequent procedures after applying for seismic reinforcement (average score of 2.07), the design-related tasks for seismic reinforcement (average score of 2.27), and the construction-related impacts of seismic reinforcement (average score of 2.73). Furthermore, professional websites are not well-promoted, and most residents learned about seismic reinforcement information through this questionnaire. In the past, prevention was not emphasized, and concerns only arose when there was obvious earthquake damage. Financial burden is a major obstacle, and a lack of clear information, a lack of technical consultation windows, issues surrounding costs and subsidy amounts, and the difficulty of obtaining 100% resident consent are major challenges. The public generally lacks understanding of the seismic resilience of private residential buildings, potential earthquake problems, and the urgency of seismic reinforcement, and is also unfamiliar with the application process and subsequent procedures. Despite the willingness to reinforce, existing information dissemination methods are ineffective, and professional websites are not well-promoted. Promoting seismic reinforcement requires multifaceted efforts, including strengthening public awareness, simplifying procedures, increasing economic incentives, clarifying construction information, and implementing differentiated subsidy policies. It should also be integrated with strategies such as urban renewal and the reconstruction of dilapidated buildings. |
||
| Advisor Committee | |||
| Files | indicate access worldwide | ||
| Date of Defense | 2025-07-09 | Date of Submission | 2025-07-13 |